Sam-bankman-fried
Sam-bankman-fried, a convicted person facing an $11 billion forfeiture, petitioned the Supreme Court on 2026-09-11 to overturn his conviction, arguing trial evidence on customer losses was excluded and forfeiture excessive.
Sam-bankman-fried is a person convicted in a matter that produced an $11 billion forfeiture. On 2026-09-11, his lawyers asked the Supreme Court to overturn the conviction, saying evidence about customer losses was excluded and the forfeiture was excessive. On 2026-09-12, he took the forfeiture fight to the Supreme Court. The newsroom coverage and recorded timeline align on these developments. No market data or other personal details are recorded in the evidence pack. The case remains before the Supreme Court as of the reported dates.
Overview
Sam-bankman-fried is a person convicted in a matter that produced an $11 billion forfeiture. On 2026-09-11, his lawyers asked the Supreme Court to overturn the conviction, saying evidence about customer losses was excluded and the forfeiture was excessive. On 2026-09-12, he took the forfeiture fight to the Supreme Court. The newsroom coverage and recorded timeline align on these developments. No market data or other personal details are recorded in the evidence pack. The case remains before the Supreme Court as of the reported dates.
Recent developments
In September 2026, Bankman-Fried petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn his conviction and contested the $11 billion forfeiture. His lawyers argued that evidence about customer losses was excluded and the forfeiture was excessive. On 2026-09-12, he advanced the forfeiture fight to the Supreme Court.
History
On 2026-09-11, Sam-bankman-fried's lawyers asked the Supreme Court to overturn his conviction and argued the $11 billion forfeiture was excessive because evidence about customer losses was excluded. On 2026-09-12, he took the $11B forfeiture fight to the Supreme Court.
Historical context
The recorded timeline from 2026-09-11 to 2026-09-12 shows a sequence where Bankman-Fried asked the Supreme Court to overturn his conviction and then took the forfeiture fight to the Court, matching the newsroom coverage.
Outlook
Will the Supreme Court accept Bankman-Fried's petition to overturn the conviction? Will the Court rule that the excluded evidence about customer losses affected the trial? Will the $11 billion forfeiture be deemed excessive?
Latest coverage
10 storiesWIPO had previously found that Uniswap.com was used in bad faith.
Hayden Adams says SBF once paid seven figures for the Uniswap.com domain and aimed it at a fork. Uniswap got it back free. The post Uniswap Founder Reveals Sam-Bankman Fried Paid 7 Figures for Uniswap.com and Lost It appeared first on BeInCrypto .
Amazon has $190B on its balance sheet with historical ties to effective altruism and one of its influencers, Sam Bankman-Fried. The post Amazon’s $190B Anthropic stake has links to SBF appeared first on Protos .
SBF's lawyer says the $11 billion FTX fine would leave him broke for life as the Supreme Court weighs his appeal. The post If Sam Bankman-Fried Left Prison Today, He'd Be Poor Forever, Lawyer Says appeared first on BeInCrypto .
Bankman-Fried’s lawyers challenged the exclusion of evidence about customer losses and argued that his $11 billion forfeiture was excessive.
Bankman-Fried says he was unfairly barred from providing evidence that FTX had more than enough assets to cover losses from the collapse.
Timeline
15 recorded events- 22 Sept 2026DevelopmentHayden Adams Claims SBF Bought Uniswap.com to ‘Flex’ on the Company
WIPO had previously found that Uniswap.com was used in bad faith.
- 21 Sept 2026DevelopmentUniswap Founder Reveals Sam-Bankman Fried Paid 7 Figures for Uniswap.com and Lost It
Hayden Adams says SBF once paid seven figures for the Uniswap.com domain and aimed it at a fork. Uniswap got it back free. The post Uniswap Founder Reveals Sam-Bankman Fried Paid 7 Figures for Uniswap.com and Lost It appeared first on BeInCrypto .
- 21 Sept 2026UpgradeUniswap Founder Reveals Sam-Bankman Fried Paid 7 Figures for Uniswap.com and Lost It
Hayden Adams says SBF once paid seven figures for the Uniswap.com domain and aimed it at a fork. Uniswap got it back free. The post Uniswap Founder Reveals Sam-Bankman Fried Paid 7 Figures for Uniswap.com and Lost It appeared first on BeInCrypto .
- 18 Sept 2026DevelopmentAmazon’s $190B Anthropic stake has links to SBF
Amazon has $190B on its balance sheet with historical ties to effective altruism and one of its influencers, Sam Bankman-Fried. The post Amazon’s $190B Anthropic stake has links to SBF appeared first on Protos .
- 14 Sept 2026DevelopmentIf Sam Bankman-Fried Left Prison Today, He'd Be Poor Forever, Lawyer Says
SBF's lawyer says the $11 billion FTX fine would leave him broke for life as the Supreme Court weighs his appeal. The post If Sam Bankman-Fried Left Prison Today, He'd Be Poor Forever, Lawyer Says appeared first on BeInCrypto .
- 14 Sept 2026EnforcementIf Sam Bankman-Fried Left Prison Today, He'd Be Poor Forever, Lawyer Says
SBF's lawyer says the $11 billion FTX fine would leave him broke for life as the Supreme Court weighs his appeal. The post If Sam Bankman-Fried Left Prison Today, He'd Be Poor Forever, Lawyer Says appeared first on BeInCrypto .
- 12 Sept 2026Development‘We are unpersuaded’ – Sam Bankman Fried takes $11B forfeiture fight to Supreme Court
Will the Supreme Court be able to give Sam Bankman-Fried a second chance or move ahead with their judgement?
- 11 Sept 2026DevelopmentSBF asks Supreme Court to overturn conviction, $11B forfeiture: Report
Bankman-Fried’s lawyers challenged the exclusion of evidence about customer losses and argued that his $11 billion forfeiture was excessive.
Quick facts
5 fields- Type
- Person
- Name
- Sam-bankman-fried
- Conviction
- Convicted; Supreme Court petition to overturn filed 2026-09-11
- Forfeiture
- $11 billion (challenged as excessive)
- Recent action
- Took forfeiture fight to Supreme Court 2026-09-12
Frequently asked
- What did Sam-bankman-fried's lawyers argue to the Supreme Court?
- They challenged the exclusion of evidence about customer losses and argued the $11 billion forfeiture was excessive.
- When did Sam-bankman-fried petition the Supreme Court?
- The newsroom coverage and timeline record the petition on 2026-09-11, with further action on 2026-09-12.