He calls them an adoption cycle from 2011 to 2018, an adolescence cycle from 2018 to 2022, and a maturity cycle from 2022 onward.
Checkmate argues these phases were driven by changing adoption patterns and market structure, not by the block reward cuts that happen every four years.
He even said Bitcoin is “the only other endgame asset alongside gold,” suggesting the current phase could stretch longer than many expect.
In my opinion, Bitcoin has experienced three cycles, and they are not anchored around the halvings.
Reports have disclosed that the halving theory remains popular because markets have peaked in the year after previous halvings — 2013, 2017, and 2021 are often pointed to as examples.
That view keeps a simple timing model alive: halving, then peak the next year. It’s tidy and it’s easy to model, which is why many traders still use it.
Based on reports, some voices now put more weight on liquidity and institutional flows than on calendar-based events.
Analysts say the cycle is not officially over until the market sees positive returns next year. The four-year cycle may be finished.
They added that business cycle dynamics explain the peaks and troughs better than halving dates. Market veterans keep it practical: cycles never truly disappear — people buy, prices rise, then sellers clear the gains, and we start again.
How long the bullish leg runs depends on where liquidity sits and how much new capital arrives.
At the same time, proponents of the halving-linked model note the historical pattern: bull peaks occurred after the halving in multiple cycles. Both sides use hard dates and numbers — years like 2011, 2013, 2017, 2021, 2022, 2025 and 2026 — to make their cases.
Featured image from Equiti, chart from TradingView
