Prosecutors had asked for a three-year prison term. The court applied the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes in reaching its verdict.
Judges said factors such as full repayment and Hwang’s lack of a prior criminal record weighed in favor of leniency.
According to charging documents, the withdrawals were recorded as provisional payments or advances and were later routed from the agency’s accounts into accounts controlled by Hwang.
Before the verdict, Hwang repaid the full amount, according to media reports and statements from her agency. Two large repayments were made on May 30, 2024 and June 5, 2024, reportedly funded by selling personal assets.
Hwang publicly apologized in court and in statements, calling the moves a misjudgment and accepting responsibility for her actions. Her agency has said that, as of mid-June 2025, all financial obligations between the actress and the company were settled.
Broadcasters reacted quickly. Based on reports, some networks edited Hwang out of programs, and a number of brand deals were paused or canceled.
The damage is both legal and reputational. While the court noted that the agency operated as a one-person company and that outside victims were limited, advertisers and networks tend to move fast when a high-profile legal case emerges.
Legal observers say the case highlights growing scrutiny of how entertainers handle company funds and crypto investments. South Korea has been tightening rules and oversight around virtual assets, and this verdict could signal stricter enforcement in the future.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
