The community vote tallied 98.27% in favor, 1.05% opposed, and 0.69% abstaining, with 52% of the total stake participating in the decision.
The upgrade introduces Votor, a direct-vote-based system that finalizes blocks through single or dual-round voting processes depending on network conditions.
The protocol transformation promises to slash transaction finality from TowerBFT’s current 12.8 seconds to as low as 100-150 milliseconds.
The network achieves bandwidth efficiency gains by eliminating heavy gossip traffic that currently burdens the system.
Alpenglow’s architecture centers on direct validator communication using cryptographic aggregates to prove consensus.
Validators exchange votes directly rather than through the network’s gossip protocol, reducing computational overhead and communication costs.
Alpenglow operates on a “20+20” resilience model, maintaining network liveness even when 20% of validators act maliciously and another 20% remain unresponsive.
The protocol divides time into slots with predetermined leaders responsible for consecutive periods called leader windows.
Young projected that SOL could reach $215 by the end of September and $250 by the end of the fourth quarter, citing technical improvements alongside growing institutional treasury holdings that exceed $1.7 billion.
Implementation details and timeline for network deployment remain under development as validators prepare for the consensus transition.
The upgrade fundamentally changes Solana’s economic model by moving voting off-chain. Validators will no longer submit vote transactions for each slot, eliminating bandwidth overhead and transaction fees.
Instead, the protocol introduces the Validator Admission Ticket (VAT), requiring validators to pay 1.6 SOL per epoch as an upfront cost to maintain economic barriers to participation.
Leaders receive compensation for aggregating and submitting vote data, earning rewards equal to the total value of all votes included in their aggregates.
Additional bonuses apply for processing fast-finalization or finalization certificates, recognizing the higher computational costs associated with these services.
This improvement positions Solana’s performance closer to Web2 application response times while maintaining blockchain security guarantees.
