Stablecoins have emerged as a bridge between cryptocurrency’s volatile world and traditional assets’ stability. But a recent study casts doubt on just how “real” this stability might be.

crypto -

The study by Visa and Allium Labs suggests a surprising truth: over 90% of stablecoins transactions may not originate from genuine users. This raises a critical question: what exactly is driving this massive volume of activity?

Where’s the User?

The intended purpose of stablecoins is to facilitate everyday transactions and act as a store of value. However, the study’s findings paint a different picture. The sheer volume of non-user transactions suggests potential manipulation or even wash trading, where investors create artificial demand by buying and selling to themselves. This can inflate the perceived value of a stablecoin and create a false sense of stability.

Tether Tightens the Grip

Tether, a leading stablecoin issuer pegged to the US dollar, has noticed. In response to the study’s findings, they are reportedly ramping up their transaction monitoring systems to identify and combat potential illicit activity. This is a positive step but highlights the ongoing challenges of ensuring transparency and legitimacy within the stablecoin ecosystem.

The Road Ahead

Stablecoins hold immense promise for the future of finance.

However, the issue of non-user transactions needs to be addressed. Regulatory bodies and stablecoin issuers can help establish clear guidelines and robust monitoring systems.

For crypto enthusiasts, this is a wake-up call. It’s crucial to remain vigilant and understand the potential risks associated with stablecoins. Until the transparency issue is resolved, the true potential of stablecoins as a reliable and trustworthy financial tool may remain elusive.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here