Charles Hoskinson issued a rebuttal on November 3, rejecting circulating headlines that claimed he blamed Cardano’s users for the network’s decentralized finance shortfall. In a brief video, the Cardano founder said media outlets misrepresented his prior comments about participation patterns across the ecosystem, stressing that his point was a structural “mismatch” between who stakes and governs versus who takes part in DeFi—not blame.
Hoskinson’s core claim is numerical and directional rather than accusatory. He argued there is a demonstrable divergence between Cardano’s high participation in staking and governance and its lower participation in DeFi protocols, which depresses total value locked. “I pointed out in a video that there is a mismatch between the people who participate in staking and governance and the people who participate in DeFi. And if there was proportionality there… our TVL would be at least five to 10 billion,” he said. He characterized the recent headlines as “materially wrong and factually wrong” because they attributed intent—“blaming users”—that he explicitly disavowed.
The founder anchored his point in a specific user count comparison. Some third-party measurements, he said, “are asserting that Cardano has only 10,000 to 50,000 actual users when there’s 1.3 million who are using staking.” For Hoskinson, that delta underscores that Cardano “has a large population, a large wallet base, and a lot of users as evidenced by the enormous level of participation in both governance and staking,” even if those participants are not currently “deploying to the other side of the aisle, to the TVL side, to the DeFi side.”
He repeatedly emphasized that diagnosing the participation gap is an ecosystem responsibility, not a morality play. “I’m not blaming them for not participating,” he said. “Never once said it’s their fault and they’re bad people and they’ve done something wrong.” Instead, he called for a frank community conversation about the drivers behind users’ choices. “It could be slippage. It could be fees. It could be user experience. It could be yields. It could be safety concerns. It could be education. There could be 150,000 different reasons for that. But we as an ecosystem have to have that discussion.”
The dispute originated, he said, when media took a narrow, data-driven observation about where Cardano users allocate capital and translated it into a blame narrative. “People say something very specific, very targeted, and then it gets misinterpreted, and then everybody judges you based upon the headlines,” he said. “I’m not going to allow the crypto media to go ahead and put words in my mouth.” He reiterated the same point multiple times for emphasis: “I did not blame the Cardano ecosystem. I did not blame the Cardano users for anything. I was very careful, guarded, and specific in the things that I said.”
Hoskinson coupled the clarification with a broader critique of crypto media practices. “If you continue to broadcast, you’re lying to people,” he said, adding, “I expect that from the crypto media because they are scum. They do lie. Everything’s sensational. Everything’s clickbait.” He framed his intervention as a corrective to prevent a headline cycle from hardening into accepted fact: “The record has been corrected.”
At press time, ADA traded at $0.538.
