The session places the long-contested boundary between securities and commodities under a single camera feed, which matters for where assets can trade, which disclosures apply, and how surveillance is coordinated.
First, the scope of the securities test for exchange-traded digital assets and whether standardized listing and disclosure templates can expand beyond bitcoin and ether. Panelists will examine templates and data-sharing mechanisms, which could directly affect how quickly large-cap tokens move onto registered venues with surveillance agreements in place.
Second, the location of spot-market oversight, including whether the CFTC obtains a clearer lane over cash markets for digital commodities through memoranda of understanding or an SRO-style framework coordinated with the SEC, a topic the CFTC has put on the table.
Flows and market structure give the roundtable immediate consequence. U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs continue to pull in, or shed, hundreds of millions of dollars on single days, providing a high-frequency barometer for regulated demand.
If the SEC and CFTC converge on listing templates and surveillance expectations, the next wave of products could move beyond single-asset ETFs into baskets or sector exposures, with registered exchanges handling the underlying cash trading.
That would redirect liquidity toward venues with consolidated surveillance and clear disclosure duties and tighten the linkage between ETF primary markets, reference pricing and cash-market integrity.
The CFTC’s request for comment on tokenized collateral, if followed by guidance that recognizes high-quality stablecoins for margin, would free balance sheet trapped in cash, and could increase capital efficiency at futures commission merchants and clearing members.
That in turn affects derivatives activity at established venues, because margin policy determines how much risk capital firms can deploy at a given volatility level, and whether tokenized collateral moves between custody, clearing, and settlement without manual breaks.
Prediction markets will test how the agencies draw lines between protected speech, event risk transfer, and gambling law. The agenda includes Polymarket and Kalshi, which give the commissions a platform to discuss contract categories, event definitions, election-related guardrails, and surveillance standards for manipulation.
Per the SEC agenda, the format is designed to map practical oversight questions to existing statutory tools rather than announce new rules on the spot, so the value for readers is in the direction of travel across these categories.
A template-driven approach for listings, coupled with CFTC recognition of certain tokenized collateral, would expand regulated market share in spot and derivatives, while leaving room for state or federal legislation to formalize a spot-market mandate.
A more limited outcome, where ETF approvals outpace exchange authorizations, would keep flows concentrated in fund wrappers, which still rely on robust cash-market reference prices and bilateral data-sharing.
A fragmented outcome, with continued case-by-case exemptions and varying state treatments for event contracts, would keep liquidity split and leave market participants arbitraging venue rules rather than price discovery.
To ground those paths in numbers, the table below summarizes ranges that a data-driven newsroom can track against the cited baselines, using ETF flow volatility, stablecoin float, and collateral policy as the main levers.
Kraken and other exchanges are poised to argue that trading in many tokens can be supervised under existing exchange rules without treating those assets as securities, a point that turns on surveillance, custody segregation, and standardized disclosures rather than asset labels.
Polymarket is set to argue that, under CFTC supervision, information markets can contribute to price discovery in civic and economic topics when limits and KYC controls are explicit, a position consistent with its plan to operate on a licensed exchange and clearinghouse through the QCEX acquisition.
Those positions, weighed against the commissions’ statutory limits, define whether near-term clarity arrives through guidance and staff templates or remains bounded by case-specific relief.
First, whether the SEC staff publishes draft templates or FAQs that codify listing and disclosure expectations for assets beyond bitcoin and ether, with explicit surveillance language.
Second, whether the CFTC follows its request for comment with guidance that recognizes stablecoins as eligible collateral under defined standards at derivatives clearing organizations, and whether that guidance references inter-agency surveillance or data-sharing.
Third, whether the commissions open comment on event-contract categories that can be listed without litigation, a step that would give platforms a predictable path to scale.
